Sunday, 10 December 2017

Xmas Competition

The Colchester Chess Club Xmas Competition this year will be on Wednesday 20th December. It will be a duck chess competition - all welcome. To read more about this chess variant go the "official" website.

The evening will start with Nathan and Matt explaining the rules and giving people a chance to practice. The main event will then be (depending on numbers) either an all-play-all or Swiss completion.

Before then there are two matches - one for the A team and one for the B team. After the holiday period the A and B teams will be playing in the NECL knockout quarter-finals with the A team looking to defend the trophy they won last year.

Sunday, 15 October 2017

Colchester Junior Chess Club

A new junior chess club has been set up in Colchester.

WHEN

Commences on the 21st September 2017 and then every Thursday (school term dates)
4:30pm – 6:00pm

CONTACT

  • Colchesterjuniorchessclub1@gmail.com
  • 07838085656

COACH

Michael Catabay (DBS checked)

COST

£3.00 per week per child

WHERE

Hythe Community Centre
( 1st Floor )
1 Venture Drive
Colchester
C01 2FG

Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Mate in two

The puzzle below was written in 1920 by Lionel Penrose of Colchester Chess Club. It is probably his best known puzzle and took 1st place in The Observer's puzzle competition. White to play and mate in two. Solution given in the comments section.

Friday, 11 August 2017

Rapidplay grades

The rapid play grades for active Colchester players on the July ECF Grading List are:

RefNameAgeRapidplayPrevious
302172LVoelker, Norbert170E
274746HCatabay, Michael164F 
186371LStemp, Matt162E
140673FBarnes, Nathan158E150E
299554CKjenner, Svein150D151E
250046CBellinger, Clive140E
293018DJohnson, Mark117B118B
155695CDaley, Phil106E
213710ASmith, Peter99E
227455DDuff-Cole, John97E
256466LGoodman, Ed67E70E

A number of players appear on the list (or have non-F grades) for the first time.

Friday, 4 August 2017

Club competitions round-up

The 2016/17 club championship was won by Svein Kjenner, the crucial game being his win against Nathan Barnes.

Ed Goodman won the Club Shield (for best performance by a player graded under 120).

The Grand Prix (best combined score in Club Championship/Shield, Tony Locke Rapidplay and NECL matches) was won by Nathan Barnes.

Nathan also won the Tony Locke Rapidplay. Cross-table for the rapidplay competition is shown below.

Thursday, 27 July 2017

July 2017 Grades

The July 2017 ECF Grading List has been published. The standard play grades for active Colchester players are:

RefNameAgeStandardPrevious
186371LStemp, Matt183D175D
302172LVoelker, Norbert177C174D
139627EGooding, Ian175C187C
140673FBarnes, Nathan164A156B
299554CKjenner, Svein162C157C
301977ASchnell, Felix155D155E
120924DWagstaff, Michael149C145C
250046CBellinger, Clive136C131C
155695CDaley, Phil118C113C
117812LRemmer, Brian112C108C
293018DJohnson, Mark111B113A
213710ASmith, Peter110B115B
227455DDuff-Cole, John100B95C
256466LGoodman, Ed93C88D
308949GCatrinar, Adrian73F 

A few players have increased their grades - with Matt Stemp, Nathan Barnes (both +8), Svein Kjenner, Clive Bellinger, Phil Daley, John Duff-Cole and Ed Goodman (all +5) having the most significant increases. Adrian Catrinar appears on the list for the first time.

Sunday, 11 June 2017

Division 1 round-up

Both Colchester teams in Division 1 finished in the top half of the table. Colchester A finished 4th (6 wins, 1 draw, 3 defeats) with their best results being 4-0 wins against Braintree and Billericay. Overall, the A team have had a great season as they won the knockout competition but their league result was not quite as strong. There were a number of good individual performances - the A team were unbeaten on board 4 and only lost one game on board 3. Matt Stemp won all his games on the top two boards.

Colchester B finished in 6th place (with 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses). Their best results were a surprise 3-1 win against Writtle A and a 4-0 win against Billericay. Again there were lot of strong individual results; the B team scored more than 50% on boards 2 and 3.


The combined A/B team player statistics (by board) in the league are:

Board 1 (Total 10/20)
Nathan Barnes4/8
Matt Stemp3/3
Ian Gooding2.5/6
Svein Kjenner0.5/2
Norbert Voelker0/1

Board 2 (Total 10.5/20)
Norbert Voelker2.5/6
Matt Stemp2/2
Svein Kjenner2/2
Michael Catabay1.5/2
Mike Wagstaff1.5/3
Felix Schnell1/4
Nathan Barnes0/1

Board 3 (Total 14/20)
Svein Kjenner5.5/7
Felix Schnell3/3
Norbert Voelker2/2
Mike Wagstaff1.5/2
Nathan Barnes1/2
Matt Stemp0.5/1
Clive Bellinger0.5/2
Phil Daley0/1

Board 4 (Total 12.5/20)
Nathan Barnes5.5/6
Clive Bellinger2/4
Pete Smith1.5/3
Michael Catabay1/1
Felix Schnell1/1
Mike Wagstaff1/3
John Duff-Cole0.5/1
Phil Daley0/1

Below is the finish from the game on board 4 in the Writtle A - Colchester A; tripled pawns aren't always bad. The match finished in a draw.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.05.17"] [Round "?"] [White "Barnes, Nathan"] [Black "Forrester, Andy"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B00"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r3r1k1/p2n1n2/1p1q1p2/3ppNp1/3P2P1/P1PP1P2/3B1Q2/R3R1K1 b - - 0 26"] [PlyCount "38"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 26... Qf8 $6 {The queen is awkwardly placed here; it looks sensible as it seems to help strengthen the defence around the king but it is almost trapped.} 27. c4 $1 a5 {Best} (27... dxc4 $2 28. Bb4 $1 {[%csl Rc5,Rd6,Re7,Rf8,Rg7,Rh6] Black has to give up a piece as his queen has no where to go.} Nc5 29. dxc5 a5 30. Bc3 bxc5 31. dxc4 $18) 28. cxd5 $14 {White has gone a pawn up, the tripled pawns are actually quite strong as they control the centre of the board.} Nd6 29. Ng3 {Re-routing the knight to e4.} b5 $6 30. Ne4 exd4 31. Qxd4 Ne5 32. Kg2 $16 {Strengthening the defence before carrying on.} Rec8 $2 (32... Nxe4 { was Black's best option, though White still has a nearly winning position.}) 33. Nxf6+ Qxf6 34. Qxe5 {Good enough} (34. Rxe5 {was slightly better than the queen capture} Rc2 35. Rd1) 34... Qxe5 35. Rxe5 Rc2 36. Re2 {with time starting to run out I decided to play simple, obvious moves that maintained the advantage.} (36. Rxg5+ {is clearly the best move.}) 36... Re8 37. Kf2 Kf7 38. Rae1 Ra2 $2 39. Bxa5 $1 Rxa3 40. Bb4 Rxe2+ 41. Rxe2 Ra6 42. Re6 Ra2+ 43. Ke3 Ne8 $2 (43... Nc8 44. Rc6 Ra8 (44... Na7 45. Rc7+ Ke8 46. Bc5) 45. Kd4) 44. Re7+ Kf8 45. Ra7+ 1-0

Tuesday, 30 May 2017

Division 2 round-up

Colchester C finished in 6th place (out of 7) in NECL Division 2; with three wins, four draws and five defeats in the league. Positions 3 to 6 were very close together in this division, so the C team were not far away from finishing 3rd - despite having a low average grade compared to most of the other teams in the division. The team scored particularly well on board 1.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 8/12)
Mike Wagstaff5.5/8
Clive Bellinger2/2
Felix Schnell1/2

Board 2 (Total 3.5/12)
Clive Bellinger2.5/7
Brian Remmer0.5/1
Pete Smith0.5/2
Phil Daley0/2

Board 3 (Total 5.5/12)
Phil Daley2.5/4
Pete Smith2/5
John Duff-Cole0/2
Default1/1

Board 4 (Total 5.5/12)
Pete Smith2/3
Brian Remmer1/3
Phil Daley0.5/1
John Duff-Cole0.5/2
Ed Goodman0.5/2
Default1/1

Below is the finish from the game played on board 1 in the match against Braintree B. Black's king is exposed and White takes advantage quickly and effectively.

[Event "League"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.03.15"] [Round "?"] [White "Wagstaff, Mike"] [Black "Delieu, Tom"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C18"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1b4r/ppqk1pp1/4p1n1/3pP1Bp/2pP1P1P/P1P3Q1/2P1B1P1/R4RK1 b - - 0 16"] [PlyCount "40"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [SourceDate "2017.05.29"] 16... Kc6 17. Qf3 $1 {[%cal Re2c4]} b5 18. a4 {renewing the threat} Ba6 19. axb5+ Bxb5 20. f5 $1 exf5 (20... Nf8 21. fxe6 {wins at least a pawn} Nxe6 $2 ( 21... fxe6 22. Qf7 {not the best move, but simple and good enough} Qxf7 23. Rxf7 g6 24. Raxa7 Rxa7 25. Rxa7 Nd7 26. g4 hxg4 27. Bxg4 $18 {the extra pawn and bishop pair mean white is winning easily}) 22. Qxd5+ $1 {the queen can't be taken} Kxd5 $2 23. Bf3#) 21. Qxf5 Raf8 22. e6 Ne7 23. Bxe7 Qxe7 24. exf7 Rh6 ({the bishop is safe} 24... Qxe2 $2 25. Rfe1 $1 Qg4 26. Re6+ {and mate follows in a few moves}) 25. Bf3 Rd6 26. Bxh5 Rf6 27. Qg5 Rxf1+ 28. Kxf1 Qxg5 29. hxg5 Kb6 30. Kf2 Bd7 31. Ke3 Bf5 32. g6 Bxc2 33. Kf4 Be4 34. g3 Ra8 35. Ke5 Kc6 36. Rxa7 1-0

Monday, 29 May 2017

Division 3 round-up

Colchester D finished in 6th place (out of 11) in NECL Division 3, with four wins, one draw and five defeats in the league. Their 3-1 win in the final match of the season moved them up from 9th. The team's best result of the season was probably a 2.5-1.5 win against Braintree C, despite having an average grade 32 points lower than that of their opponents.

The player statistics (by board) are:

Board 1 (Total 4/10)
Phil Daley1.5/2
Brian Remmer1/2
Pete Smith0.5/4
Default1/2

Board 2 (Total 4.5/10)
Brian Remmer1.5/2
John Duff-Cole1.5/2
Pete Smith1/1
Phil Daley0.5/1
Mark Johnson0/3
Default0/1

Board 3 (Total 4.5/10)
John Duff-Cole4/6
Ed Goodman0.5/3
Default0/1

Board 4 (Total 4/10)
Adrian Catrinar2/6
Ed Goodman1/1
Default1/3

Below is a game from the match against the Division 3 winners, Clacton C. Annotations are by Mark.

[Event "NECL Division 3"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.03.14"] [Round "?"] [White "Johnson, Mark"] [Black "Ciorga, Marek"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D30"] [WhiteElo "113"] [BlackElo "124"] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 c5 5. cxd5 {after the exchanges in the centre my opponent will be left with an isolated pawn to attack.} exd5 { Alternatively} (5... cxd4 6. dxe6 Bxe6 7. Qxd4 {leaves me a pawn up}) (5... Nxd5 6. e4 {gives me nice quick development}) 6. Bg2 Be7 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. O-O O-O 9. b3 {looking to control d4 and stop his pawn advancing, makes sense to put the bishop on b2} Re8 10. Bb2 Ng4 11. Nd4 {I was pleased with this move, putting the knight on a central outpost and blocking both his his bishop and pawn, alternatively} (11. e3 Nxf2 12. Rxf2 (12. Kxf2 $4 Bxe3+ 13. Ke2 Bd4+ 14. Kd2 Bxb2 $19) 12... Bxe3 {this variation looked quite scary at the time. The computer seems to think i am fine but then again it plays much better than I do. Blacks attack looks pretty good to me.}) 11... Nc6 12. e3 a6 13. Nc3 { hitting d5} Nxd4 ({At the time I thought his best option would be} 13... Bxd4 14. exd4 Nf6 {giving up the bishop pair but saving his d5 pawn}) (13... Be6 { loses to} 14. Nxe6 fxe6 15. Qxg4) 14. exd4 Ba7 15. Nxd5 Rb8 16. Rc1 Qd6 17. h3 Nf6 18. Nxf6+ Qxf6 19. Qd2 Qg6 20. d5 $4 {Awful move, opening up the line of his bishop and allowing Qxg3 with a nasty attack on my kingside. I noticed this as soon as I pressed my clock, and spent the next few minutes with my best poker face on.} Rd8 {my opponent either doesnt notice Qxg3 or saw something i didnt} 21. Bd4 {lets try to get rid of that bishop} Bxd4 22. Qxd4 b5 23. Rfd1 Bb7 24. d6 {time to push that passed pawn!!} Bxg2 25. Kxg2 Rd7 26. Rc7 Rbd8 {neither of us apparently noticed that after} (26... Rxc7 27. dxc7 Qc6+ {picks up the pawn}) 27. Qb6 Qe4+ ({obviously if} 27... Rxd6 28. Rxd6 Rxd6 (28... Qxd6 29. Qxd6 Rxd6 30. Rc8+) 29. Qb8+ {both win instantly}) 28. Kg1 h6 29. Rxd7 Rxd7 30. Qb8+ Kh7 31. Qc8 Qe2 32. Rc1 ({At this point it still felt like i should be winning, i thought that} 32. Qxd7 Qxd1+ {would allow a perpetual check, but of course after} 33. Kh2 Qe2 34. Qxf7 {protects the f2 pawn nicely. I should have gone for this!}) 32... Qe6 33. Qxa6 Rxd6 34. Qxb5 { still a pawn up and feeling confident. Surely I can't lose?!} Rd2 {so at this point both a2 and h3 are hanging. Which do i save? The connected passed pawns look too good.} 35. a4 Qxh3 36. Qf1 $2 {a pointless backward move. a5 is much better.} Qe6 37. b4 Qe4 38. Rc4 $4 {god knows what i was thinking here, Rb1 is obvious and much better.} Qd5 39. Qb1+ g6 40. Rc1 $4 {The final mistake and a completely losing move. My plan was to bring my rook to guard f1, freeing up my queen for more active duties. Unfortunately, i have not noticed just how dangerous the semi open h-file is.} (40. Qe4 {would save the game} Rd1+ 41. Kg2 Qh5 42. Qh4 Qd5+ {with a draw by perpetual check}) 40... Qf3 41. Rf1 { protecting f1, now its just a case of pushing those passed pawns..?} Rd5 $3 { Whoops. They are going to count for nothing now, there is no good defence to 42. ...Rh5 and either 43....Rh1# or Qh1#} 0-1

Sunday, 21 May 2017

AGM

Colchester Chess Club

 A.G.M.

 

will be held on

Wed 5th July





Any items for inclusion on the Agenda to the undersigned by Wednesday 21st June




Clive Bellinger
Secretary

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

Tony Locke Rapidplay

The 2016/17 Tony Locke Rapidplay will be on Wednesday 31st May. Rules will be 15 minutes on the clock per player with each player having 5 games. Tournament will start at 19:30.

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Colchester win knockout

Colchester A have won the NECL knockout competition for the first time in 12 years. In the first round there was an edgy start as they only beat Brentwood B, a Division 3 side, 2.5-1.5 despite being significantly higher graded on every board. This result was followed by a bye in round 2.

The quarter-finals saw a comfortable 3.5-0.5 win against Witham A, though the individual games were closer than the final score suggests. In the semi-final, Brentwood A played an IM, Richard Pert, on board 1 but wins on the middle boards for Colchester saw them go through on tie break (bottom board elimination).

Writtle A, who had won the competition three times since Colchester's most recent win, were the other team to reach the final. Norbert won his game quite quickly and Matt was definitely better in his game. The last three games went close to time with Matt converting his advantage, on board 1 Ian also won with Nathan drawing on board 4 in a game where the advantage fluctuated throughout.

 

Overall four matches were played by the A team in the knockout. The team won every game on boards 2 and 3 - meaning they would have won the competition even if they had lost every game on boards 1 and 4. The player statistics (by board) for the five players who played in the matches are:

 

Board 1 (Total 2/4)
Ian Gooding2/3
Matt Stemp0/1

 

Board 2 (Total 4/4)
Matt Stemp2/2
Norbert Voelker2/2

 

Board 3 (Total 4/4)
Norbert Voelker2/2
Nathan Barnes2/2

 

Board 4 (Total 1.5/4)
Nathan Barnes0.5/1
Felix Schnell1/3

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

NECL update

There have been a number of excellent results for the club in recent matches. The C team drew 2-2 with Clacton A, despite being out-graded on every board. Felix Schnell won on board 1 with Clive Bellinger and Phil Daley drawing on boards 2 and 4.

The D team went one better with a 2.5-1.5 win against Braintree C even though they were out-graded by more than 30 points on every board. Adrian Catrinar won his first graded game, Brian Remmer won on board 1 and John Duff-Cole sealed the team win with a draw on board 2.

The A team have reached the final of the knockout with a comprehensive 3.5-0.5 win in the quarter-final against Witham A and then drawing 2-2 with Brentwood A in the semi-final but progressing due to wins on boards 2 and 3 from Norbert Voelker and Nathan Barnes. Brentwood A fielded the league's only International Master (Richard Pert) on board 1. The final will be against Writtle A whose semi-final opponents (Braintree B) defaulted 4-0.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the B team beat regular Division 1 winners Writtle A 3-1 with wins for Nathan, Svein Kjenner and Felix on the top three boards. The key parts of Felix's and Nathan's wins from this match are shown below.

Select a game from the pull-down list.

[Event "NECL Division 1 2016/17"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.02.22"] [Round "?"] [White "Barnes, Nathan"] [Black "Moore, John C"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "156"] [BlackElo "184"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1bqk2r/p1p2ppp/1nQ5/4p3/2P5/3B4/PP1N1PPP/R3K2R b KQkq - 0 12"] [PlyCount "22"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "team"] [WhiteTeam "Colchester B"] [BlackTeam "Writtle A"] 12... Qd7 13. Qe4 (13. Be4 {was the main alternative I considered and is also fine.}) 13... f5 $5 {This pawn sacrifice was the main move I had been looking at before playing Qe4. The computer agrees it is best.} 14. Qxe5+ $1 { Alternative moves are too passive and mean Black has no problems. If anything Black would have a slight edge with his pawns controlling the centre.} Kf7 $1 $11 {The only move that makes the pawn sacrifice work - it allows Black to use his rook and queen on the open files in the centre where White has an exposed King on the e-file and two pieces waiting to be skewered on the d-file.} (14... Kd8 $2 15. O-O-O Re8 16. Qg3 {Black is in trouble with his king stuck in the centre and will soon be more than a pawn down in material.}) (14... Kf8 $2 15. Be2 $18 {White is a pawn up and has more active pieces.}) (14... Qe7 $2 15. Qxe7+ Kxe7 16. O-O-O $16 {Again, White is a pawn up and comfortable.}) 15. Qg3 $1 {White had limited options due to the loose bishop on d3 and the pin threat. I spent a long time checking this move - my original intention after playing 13.Qe4 had been to play Qc3 in this position. Qc3 (and Be2) are okay but Qg3 is better as the queen is actively placed and potential skewers along the e-file prevented.} (15. -- Re8 {[%cal Re8e1] wins queen for rook.}) 15... Re8+ {Slightly better than Rd8 trying to take advantage of the slightly awkward minor pieces on the d-file.} (15... Rd8 16. Nf3 $1 {and the bishop is protected by the knight fork.} Qxd3 $4 17. Ne5+ {[%cal Re5d3,Re5f7]}) 16. Kd1 { The only move that maintains equality.} Bb7 17. Kc2 Rad8 18. Rhe1 $11 Be4 $2 { Threatening to win a piece but this is the losing mistake.} 19. Nxe4 $1 (19. Bxe4 $4 Qxd2+ {and mate will follow soon.}) (19. Rxe4 fxe4 20. Nxe4 h6 $11 { White has sufficient compensation for the exchange sacrifice but no more than that.}) 19... fxe4 20. Rxe4 (20. Bxe4 $2 Qd2+ 21. Kb3 Rxe4 $15) 20... Rxe4 21. Qf3+ $1 {The move that Black must have missed when playing 18...Be4. This zwischenzug is the only move that gives White a winning advantage.} (21. Bxe4 $2 Qd2+ 22. Kb3 Rb8 23. Qxc7+ Nd7+ 24. Bb7 $15) 21... Rf4 22. Qxf4+ Kg8 23. Qe4 {After the dust has settled White is simply two pawns up. White made parts of the rest of the game more complex than necessary but eventually won.} 1-0 [Event "NECL Division 1 2016/17"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.02.22"] [Round "?"] [White "Schnell, Felix"] [Black "Thomson, Phil"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "155"] [BlackElo "163"] [ECO "B15"] [Annotator "Barnes,Nathan"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2rr1nk1/1pb2ppp/2p1p1q1/2P5/1P1PQP1P/4B1P1/B5K1/2R1R3 w - - 0 36"] [PlyCount "41"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "team"] [WhiteTeam "Colchester B"] [BlackTeam "Writtle A"] 36. Qf3 $1 {Avoiding the queen exchange is best - from here the queen puts pressure on Black's queenside pawns.} Ra8 37. Bb1 {Attacking the queen.} Qf6 38. b5 $1 {White will either win a pawn or get a protected passed pawn.} Ba5 $2 39. Red1 (39. bxc6 $142 $1 bxc6 40. Re2 Rdc8 41. Be4 $18) 39... cxb5 40. Qxb7 { Material is equal but the c-pawn is too strong.} Rdb8 41. Qe4 Qd8 42. f5 Qd5 $2 43. fxe6 $1 fxe6 44. Kh3 $2 {Not necessary, gives Black time to regroup - though White is still best.} Qxe4 $2 (44... Bc7 $142 $1 $16) 45. Bxe4 Ra7 46. d5 Bd8 47. d6 Ra4 48. Bc2 Rc4 49. Bb3 Re4 50. Bd4 g5 51. hxg5 Bxg5 52. Rc2 Rc8 53. c6 h6 54. d7 Nxd7 55. cxd7 Ra8 56. Rc8+ 1-0

Saturday, 18 February 2017

History of the NECL

A number of recent posts have contained material taken from the booklet "History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. R. Priestley. This covers the period from before the NECL was formed in the 1960s to the mid-1980s. The entire booklet can now be read and downloaded from the historical archive which is on the About the club page on this website or by clicking here.

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

NECL Division 2: 1970/71


Final League Table 1970/71

Division 2


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
6
3
3
0
14½
9
Maldon
6
2
3
1
15½
7
Wickford
6
3
1
2
11½
10½
7
Witham
6
2
2
2
11
13
6
Marconi
6
2
1
3
10
14
5
Braintree
6
1
2
3
10
14
4
Chelmsford
6
2
0
4
14½
4



Chelmsford dominated the second division in the late 1970's and early 1980's but, as this table shows, things were rather different in 1971.

The match between Colchester and Wickford included two double defaults, which is why the aggregate of game points won and lost by the two totals 22 and not 24.
Colchester finished unbeaten for the second season in succession.

Sunday, 12 February 2017

Fooling the computer

The position below is taken from S Coughlan - I Gooding (Board 1, Witham A v Colchester A, 2017), black to play. When you put this position into the computer it spots the best move straight away but thinks that there are many other moves that are also winning. It is only when you leave it to think for a while that it realises that there is only one move to win. What is it? Answer in the comments.

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

January 2017: ECF grades

The January 2017 ECF Grading List has been published. The standard play grades for active Colchester players are:

RefNameAgeStandardPrevious
139627EGooding, Ian187C191B
186371LStemp, Matt175D176D
302172LVoelker, Norbert174D184D
299554CKjenner, Svein157C152B
140673FBarnes, Nathan156B148A
301977ASchnell, Felix155D155E
120924DWagstaff, Michael145C144C
250046CBellinger, Clive131C129C
213710ASmith, Peter115B108C
155695CDaley, Phil113C119C
293018DJohnson, Mark113A105B
298130AJaufarally, Mohammud111A104A
117812LRemmer, Brian108C110C
227455DDuff-Cole, John95C92C
256466LGoodman, Ed88D86C

A few players have increased their grades - with Nathan Barnes (+8), Mark Johnson (+8), Pete Smith (+7), Mo Jaufarally (+7) and Svein Kjenner (+5) having the most significant increases.

Friday, 13 January 2017

HOCCC: 1966-72 Rapid Development (of the North Essex Chess League) part 3

The material for this post is the sixth extract taken from the booklet "The History of the North Essex Chess League" by J. Priestley.



Ray Keene was elected president of the League, reflecting his visits to give simultaneous displays and his assistance with adjudications. The burden of work which fell upon the shoulders of the General Secretary had become very considerable with the introduction of the knockout competition and the expansion of the championship into two divisions, so separate officers of League Championship Secretary and Knockout Tournament Controller were created to spread the load. The first incumbents were John Standley of Colchester and Gareth Tucker of STL respectively.

Both STL and RAMC withdrew from the championship in 1971/72, and competed only in the Knockout. By so doing, they opened the way for a significant change in the operation of League competitions. Until then, every club had been expected to field its first team in the first division, and to enter the other competitions according to its wishes. But there now followed the rather more logical concept of clubs entering the competitions to which they were best suited. Withdrawal from the championship was a great disappointment for the players of STL, who had performed well enough to finish in mid-table in both of the two preceding seasons, and who on one occasion scored a sensational 5½ - ½ victory over Essex University. The departure of two or three key players was the reason for their enforced retirement from the premier event. Today's players who have been around long enough to have visited STL will remember not only the luxurious playing conditions but also the interesting novelty of a large blackboard on which results were entered as soon as games finished. This could have quite a demoralising effect on visiting teams unfortunate enough to suffer a couple of early reverses!

Voting rights at committee meetings, which had always been vested only in club representatives, were extended so as to include officers. This was a very logical step, as it was the officers who provided much of the continuity, some clubs changing the identity of their representatives fairly frequently.
RAMC departed at the end of the 1971-72 season, as did founder member Hoffmans, who had seen a steady decline in membership and who had latterly been reduced to a playing membership of seven.  Most people playing in the League today are unaware that at one time the whole concept of organised inter-club play in the area probably hinged on the ability of this gallant little club to subscribe to it. Every former club has played its part in the development of the League, but none more so than Hoffmanns. Although never in contention for honours, the club achieved several notable results. At one time or another wins were recorded against every other first division club, with the exception of Essex University, including a famous victory over mighty neighbours Chelmsford.

See also: Essex-Suffolk Border League, formation of the NECL, first two years of NECL

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

NECL Division One: 1966/67

Back in 1967 Colchester won Division One of the NECL, information taken from the History of the NECL booklet used for quite a few of the most recent posts. This was the third season in the competition and the second time that Colchester had won the league.


Final League Table 1966/67


P
W
D
L
F
A
P
Colchester
12
9
2
1
46
26
20
Chelmsford
12
8
1
3
47½
24½
17
Essex University
12
8
0
4
42½
29½
16
Braintree
12
6
2
4
37
35
14
Hoffmans
12
3
2
7
31
41
8
Maldon
12
4
0
8
31
41
8
Coggeshall
12
0
1
11
17
55
1


Full League tables were not published in the League's first two seasons so the above, showing the final outcome in the third season, was the first of its kind. Note that Hoffmanns and Maldon tied for fifth place, as both match points and game points were equal.